Ramp and Navan end up on the same shortlist, and it makes sense. Both say business travel and the money spent on it can live in one system. Both have pushed an AI layer to the front of the product. Look underneath, though, and they are built from opposite starting points, and the starting point decides more than any feature list will tell you: what you pay, where the booking sits, and how much of the work still lands on whoever is actually taking the trip.
That last question rarely appears on an evaluation scorecard, and it is the one that decides how either platform feels once it is actually in use.
Ramp vs Navan: Where Each One Starts
Ramp starts with the card. It is a spend management platform that pairs corporate cards, physical and virtual, with software for travel and expenses, bill payment and accounting. Someone spends, and the receipt goes in and the expense gets completed from SMS or Slack rather than from a monthly report. Travel is one module sitting inside that machine.
Navan starts with the trip. It combines business travel booking, expense management and corporate cards in a single platform, and it handles receipts, reimbursement and policy approvals as well. Someone books from a global inventory, Ava curates hotel options that comply with company policy, and transactions are captured and categorized automatically. Booking is the entry point, and expense management sits downstream of it.
Worth saying plainly before any of the comparing starts: most of Ramp is not travel. Cards, expenses, accounts payable, accounting sync and treasury make up the bulk of the platform. Weigh Ramp against Navan on travel alone and you are holding one module up against a whole product. An honest version of this comparison has to account for that rather than pretend the two are shaped alike.
At a Glance
| Catch | Ramp | Navan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI Executive Assistant with a beta for booking and managing supported business flights and hotels | Spend management platform: corporate cards, expenses, accounts payable, with a travel module | Corporate travel and expense platform |
| How each describes booking | Catch books on your behalf, from calendar and email context | In Ramp, or with any travel provider | In Navan, from its global inventory |
| Travel inventory named in their materials | Supported flights and hotels, booked by Catch itself in beta for selected customers | Flights, hotels and car rentals | Flights, hotels, trains, rental cars and black cars, with negotiated rates |
| Published pricing | Flat $99 per month, all channels and calls included | Free plan at $0 per user per month; Plus at $15 per user per month plus a platform fee based on team size; Enterprise custom | Travel booking free, funded by supplier commissions; Navan Expense free for the first 5 monthly expensing users, then $15 per user per month; Enterprise custom |
| AI layer | Catch acts across every channel and places real outbound phone calls | OCR extraction on invoices, with AI expense reviews on Plus | Ava as hotel concierge, Waiver Agent for disruptions, and spend analyst for admins |
| After the booking is made | Catch keeps managing the trip, rebooks when a better rate appears or plans move | Transactions from any provider are matched to the booking and receipts captured | The Waiver Agent monitors airline waivers so travelers can rebook ahead of a disruption |
| 24/7 travel phone support | Catch is reachable on your usual channels around the clock | On the Plus and Enterprise tiers | Listed under the Business plan as 24/7 travel support agents |
Ramp Overview
Ramp’s core loop is fast and genuinely well built. An employee spends on a Ramp card, and the receipt goes in from where the employee already is: expenses can be completed and receipts submitted by SMS or Slack. OCR pulls the data off an uploaded invoice on its own. On the Plus tier, cards can be locked automatically when required receipts do not turn up on time. It is a direct approach and it does the job. Reviewers notice this part. One G2 user put it simply: “The text message feature lets me upload receipts instantly, saving time and energy.”
On travel, Ramp lets users book flights, hotels and car rentals. The more interesting design choice is that it does not insist on it. Book with any travel provider you like and Ramp will match those transactions to the bookings and capture the receipts. The categorized expense then syncs to accounting, with QuickBooks Online and Xero integrating natively.
Guest booking is a real strength and worth naming. When someone books a flight or hotel for an external guest, a contractor, a candidate, a consultant, the guest never gets pulled into the company’s software. The booking details arrive by email, with no platform access required. The one documented limit is scope: Ramp’s help materials state that in the guest flow you can book flights and hotels but not rental cars. That is a constraint on booking for a guest, not on Ramp’s car rental booking generally, which is available to ordinary users on every tier including Free.
Around all of that sits the rest of the platform: bill payments by ACH, card, check and wire, plus free wires and same-day ACH through Bill Pay even on the Free tier. If travel is one line item among many that finance wants under one roof, that breadth is the argument for Ramp.
Navan Overview
Navan’s product is the trip and everything downstream of it. The inventory covers flights, hotels, trains, rental cars and black cars with negotiated rates attached, the longer published list of the two. Transactions are captured and categorized automatically, and a corporate card linked through Navan Connect reconciles on its own. Out-of-pocket spend gets handled by photographing a receipt, which then routes for approval.
The AI layer is where Navan has spent its recent energy, and it is more than a chat box. Ava works as a hotel concierge, using a multimodal approach to learn a traveler’s preferences around amenities, room size and loyalty programs, then curating compliant hotel options against them. A separate Waiver Agent monitors airline waivers in real time and alerts travelers to rebook before a disruption strands them. For finance, Ava changes hats and works as a data analyst: summarizing spend by category, comparing spend against policy, forecasting future travel habits.
Money and identity are handled in the same place. Navan issues its own corporate cards with built-in expense management and up to 1.5% back, and Navan Connect lets a company keep existing Visa, Mastercard or American Express corporate cards and still get automatic reconciliation. More than 30 HRIS integrations keep employee records in sync. Navan Rewards adds something for the traveler: employees earn personal travel credit when they book under budget, so compliance carries a personal upside instead of only a rule.
Structurally, the Business plan targets companies up to 300 employees and lists global travel inventory with exclusive rates and 24/7 travel support agents. Enterprise covers organizations above 300 employees, adding dedicated support and corporate negotiated rates, with custom pricing.
Pricing: Where the Two $15 Figures Differ
Both vendors publish a $15 per user per month figure. They are not measuring the same thing, and setting them side by side is the fastest route to a wrong conclusion.
Ramp’s $15 is the Plus tier: $15 per user per month, plus a platform fee based on team size. Plus is what unlocks things like AI-driven expense reviews and automatic card locking for missing receipts. Underneath it sits a genuine Free plan at $0 per user per month that includes unlimited physical and virtual cards, and above it an Enterprise tier with custom pricing, a dedicated account manager and priority 24/7 global support. Annual billing takes 20% off Plus. The variable to pin down before you sign is that platform fee. It is set by team size, which means the $15 is only part of the number, and the total for Plus is worth getting confirmed in writing.
Navan’s $15 is the expense module and nothing else. Business travel booking is free, funded by travel providers’ commission fees, and Navan Expense is free for the first 5 monthly expensing users, then $15 per user per month. Enterprise pricing is custom and not published.
Which means the arithmetic depends entirely on the shape of your company. Forty people travel and eight of them ever file an expense? Navan’s model bills you for a handful of users and hands you the booking for nothing. Everyone in the company carries a card and spends on it? Ramp’s per-seat model plus a team-size platform fee is the number to nail down before anything gets signed. Count the people who would actually be provisioned in each system, not your headcount, and get the platform fee in writing.
Where the Booking Happens
This is the sharpest difference between the two, and the one most likely to matter after rollout.
Ramp is relaxed about it. Book in Ramp, book somewhere else entirely; the platform will match the transaction to the booking and capture the receipt either way. Ramp says as much in its own materials: book with any travel provider. For a company whose travelers already have habits, preferred airlines, or an agency relationship they are not giving up, that flexibility is a real advantage.
Navan puts the booking at the centre of its own product. The global inventory covers flights, hotels, trains, rental cars and black cars at negotiated rates, Ava’s concierge learns preferences and curates compliant hotels against them, and the Waiver Agent watches for airline disruptions. It is the deeper travel product of the two, and it is the half of the platform that costs nothing.
Neither approach is wrong; they suit different companies. What they share is the shape of the purchase: a platform the company adopts, provisions and administers, with a booking flow somebody works through.
Cards, Receipts and Reconciliation
Ramp: The corporate card is the instrument the whole platform is built around, physical and virtual, unlimited even on the Free plan. Receipts and expenses go in by SMS or Slack, OCR pulls the data off invoices, and Plus adds automatic card locking when receipts go missing. Bills get paid by ACH, card, check or wire, and accounting syncs natively to QuickBooks Online and Xero. If accounts payable and bill payment sit on the same requirements list as travel, Ramp covers that ground directly.
Navan: Cards are issued in-house with expense management built in and up to 1.5% back, or you keep the cards you have and reconcile them automatically through Navan Connect. Receipt scanning handles out-of-pocket spend, transactions are categorized on their own, and approvals and reimbursement run inside the same product as the booking. Ava then reads the resulting data for finance, comparing spend against policy and forecasting where travel is heading.
Both are competent here. The deciding factor is usually breadth against depth: Ramp reaches further across the finance stack, Navan goes deeper on the travel half of it.
What Both of Them Ask of the Traveler
Read the two product stories back to back and you notice how much of each one is addressed to finance rather than to the person on the plane. Card issuance, receipt capture and reconciliation sit on both feature lists, and those are finance’s problems before they are the traveler’s. Both are, in the end, platforms a company adopts and administers.
The traveler sits downstream of that decision. In Ramp they carry the card, send the receipt in from SMS or Slack, and either book in Ramp or book elsewhere and let the transaction get matched. In Navan they book in the platform, choose from the hotel options Ava curates against policy, photograph the receipts and route them for approval. Both take a great deal of manual work off the finance team. The trip itself still gets arranged inside a booking product.
Which is why a third kind of buyer keeps entering this evaluation: executives, or the people supporting executives, whose problem is not policy compliance or reconciliation. It is that somebody still has to compare three flights, find a hotel near the actual meeting, call the front desk about a late checkout, and redo half of it when the Tuesday meeting moves to Thursday.
Where Catch Fits
Catch is an AI Executive Assistant, and travel booking is currently in beta for selected Catch customers. It is not a platform you log into and administer. It is a delegate that does the supported work.
Catch books supported flights and hotels as the travel agent itself, working from calendar and email context instead of handing you a search box. A conference ticket lands in the inbox, or a meeting in another city shows up on the calendar, and Catch comes back with the usual flight and the usual hotel ready to book, before anyone has asked. It applies learned preferences, including the ones you only ever expressed as a complaint, so the executive who once flagged a hotel with no gym stops being shown hotels without gyms. Where a company has a travel policy, Catch books within it, respecting the agreed rates and the upgrades it authorizes. Ground transportation remains outside Catch’s current scope.
Then comes the last mile, the part booking tools hand back to the traveler. Picking a hotel within a short walk of the actual meeting address. Calling the front desk to confirm there is a kettle or a USB-C charger in the room. Arranging late checkout. Those are real outbound phone calls placed from a Catch number, with the agent identifying itself as an AI agent up front. And it does not stop at the confirmation email: Catch keeps watching the booking, will cancel and rebook when a better rate appears, and rearranges the trip when the trip itself moves.
The same assistant runs the rest of the admin: triaging email and surfacing only what needs you, resolving calendar conflicts by actually reaching out to reschedule, sending emails on your behalf, and placing the calls that scheduling actually takes. It reaches you on Slack, email, text message, iMessage or the phone, whichever you already use, at a flat $99 per month with voice calls included and no per-call fees. For context, a fully loaded US executive assistant runs somewhere around $120,000 to $180,000 a year. The point is not that anyone should be let go. It is that the repetitive admin gets handled so the person doing it today moves up into the work software cannot cover.
The boundary is worth stating rather than glossing over. Ramp and Navan are spend platforms: expenses, receipts and card issuance sit with them, and Navan adds reimbursement and policy approvals on top. That is what a finance team is buying. Catch’s travel beta books supported flights and hotels and keeps managing those bookings. Ground transportation, expense and T&E management, receipts, and reimbursement are not things Catch does, so it sits alongside other systems rather than replacing them. Catch is also built around business travel, not leisure trip planning.
Choose a spend platform when spend control, expenses, and policy administration are the priority. Choose Catch when you need the trip and surrounding admin booked and managed on your behalf.
Which One Fits Your Company
Choose Catch if:
- The bottleneck is that someone has to do the booking, not that spending is out of control
- You want travel booked proactively from your own calendar and inbox, without opening a search tool
- You want the last mile handled: the hotel near the meeting, the call to the front desk, the late checkout
- You want the trip actively managed after booking, rebooked when rates drop or plans move
- You want one assistant running email, calendar, scheduling and phone calls, not just travel
- You want a flat, published $99 per month with no per-call fees and no platform fee to negotiate
- You already have a travel policy and want bookings to respect it without buying a console to enforce it
Choose Ramp if:
- Corporate cards, bill payment and accounting sync matter as much as travel
- Your travelers already book where they like and you need the spend captured rather than the behavior changed
- Booking travel for external guests without giving them platform access is a regular need
Choose Navan if:
- Travel booking is the immediate problem and you want it live without a separate line item
- Only a small slice of your headcount ever files an expense, which keeps the per-user expense price low
One caveat on each. Ramp’s Plus platform fee is set by team size, so get the total in writing before you commit. Navan gives the travel away and prices the expense side per user, so your cost turns on how many people file expenses in a month, not on how many people travel.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Ramp or Navan?
For travel specifically, Navan is the stronger product: booking is the core of it rather than a module, the published inventory is broader, and Ava curates compliant hotel options while the traveler is still choosing. Ramp wins when travel is one line among cards, expenses, accounts payable and accounting that finance wants under one roof. But if what you want is for the trip to be handled rather than for the search to be easier, that is the case for Catch: it does the booking instead of giving you a better place to do it.
Is Ramp a travel booking platform?
Only partly. Ramp is a spend management platform built around corporate cards, expenses and accounts payable, and travel booking is one module inside it. Users can book flights, hotels and car rentals through Ramp, or book with any travel provider and have Ramp match the transactions and capture the receipts.
How much does Ramp cost compared to Navan?
They are not priced on the same thing. Ramp has a Free plan at $0 per user per month, a Plus plan at $15 per user per month plus a platform fee based on team size, and a custom Enterprise tier. Navan gives travel booking away free, funded by supplier commissions, and charges $15 per user per month for expense after the first 5 monthly expensing users. Count how many people would be provisioned in each system before you compare the two figures.
What is Ramp’s Plus platform fee?
Ramp’s Plus plan is $15 per user per month plus a platform fee based on team size, so the $15 is only part of the total. Annual billing takes 20% off the Plus rate. Get the platform fee confirmed in writing during the sales conversation.
Can Navan book ground transportation?
Yes. Navan’s inventory covers flights, hotels, trains, rental cars and black cars, with negotiated rates attached, and its help materials include dedicated guidance on booking and configuring black car travel.
Can Ramp book travel for someone outside the company?
Yes, for flights and hotels. A Ramp user can book on behalf of an external guest, and the guest receives the booking details by email without needing an account or access to the platform. Ramp’s own documentation notes that rental cars are not part of that guest flow.
Which one has better AI?
They point their AI at different problems. Ramp’s is aimed at the paperwork: OCR that extracts invoice data automatically, with AI expense reviews on the Plus tier. Navan’s Ava is aimed at the trip, working as a hotel concierge that learns traveler preferences, a Waiver Agent that watches for airline disruptions, and a spend analyst for finance. Catch’s AI books supported flights and hotels in its travel beta and places real phone calls on your behalf.
Can Ramp capture travel booked somewhere else?
Yes. Ramp states that users can book with any travel provider, and it will match those transactions to the bookings and capture the receipts.
How do Navan and Concur compare instead?
Different axis: one is travel-first with paid expense, the other is expense-first with travel in its top tier. We covered it in full in Navan vs Concur, and there is a deeper look at Navan on its own in our Navan review and a breakdown of the numbers in Navan pricing.
What if I just want someone to book the trip for me?
Then you want a delegate, not a platform. Catch is an AI Executive Assistant whose travel beta books supported flights and hotels from calendar and email context, handles hotel details by phone, and keeps managing those bookings afterwards, for a flat $99 per month. It books within your company’s travel policy where you have one. Ground transportation, expenses, receipts, and reimbursement are not part of what Catch does, so it works alongside other systems rather than replacing them.